A Subconference of the World Design Cities Conference

Designing AI's
Boundaries:
Respecting Human Agency

Shanghai · September 26–29, 2026

Venue
SUES & Tongji University
Format
Dialogue · No Papers
Chair
Michael Lissack

Is There Too Much AI?

Every discipline now confronts the same recursive problem: AI systems are redesigning the people who are supposed to govern them. This conference refuses to treat that as a technical puzzle with a technical solution. Instead, we ask a design question — how do we draw boundaries that respect what only humans can do?

Hosted within the World Design Cities Conference, this three-day subconference brings together complexity scientists, philosophers of mind, AI researchers, educators, and a playwright to hold that question in dialogue. No paper sessions. No panel presentations. Only structured conversation — Buberian dialogues, keynote exchanges, and AI-augmented working groups — designed to produce insight that no single discipline could reach alone.

The intellectual engine is the concept of the AI Dramaturg: the recognition that every discipline has a dramaturgical function — the framing, staging, and interpretation of its own questions — that AI can partially supply but cannot replace. The irreducible remainder is situated human judgment.

Beneath that boundary lies a question about reasoning itself — about abduction, the act of deciding which explanation is worth reaching for. A model surveys an enormous field at once and weighs relevance in a single currency, learned similarity across everything in view: comprehensive, but flat. A person works from a small foreground, steered by something the model lacks — affect, bodily salience, the trained feel for what matters that can reframe a problem on a basis no text contains. A model can make the products of that judgment legible; it cannot perform the judgment. Drawing that line is the work of these three days.

DesignX

Complex, sociotechnical problems that resist traditional design methods. AI's relationship to human agency is a DesignX problem par excellence — the observer is part of the system being designed.

Second-Order Science

The presuppositions governing how a field knows what it knows. We surface them, question them, and ask what changes when AI enters the epistemic loop.

The 60/40 Split

AI can supply roughly 60% of what any discipline's dramaturgy requires. The 40% it cannot — the situated judgment, the ethical framing, the interpretive act — is the subject of this conference.

Habitus & the Tacit

A field's habitus — its durable, embodied dispositions — and its tacit know-how decide what a practitioner treats as the obvious move. A corpus-trained model can surface the sediment they leave behind, not the disposition that produced it. What it flattens is what we mean to name.

The AI Dramaturg

Every discipline has a dramaturgical function — the framing, staging, and interpretation of its own questions. AI can partially supply this function but cannot replace it. The remainder is what makes us human.

In theater, the dramaturg is the person who holds the intellectual architecture of a production — researching context, questioning choices, ensuring coherence. The dramaturg doesn't direct, doesn't act, doesn't write. The dramaturg holds the space in which meaning is made.

AI is becoming every discipline's dramaturg. It can retrieve, synthesize, pattern-match, and propose — reasoning, in effect, over a learned surrogate of human practice. But it cannot make the situated judgment that transforms information into understanding. This conference asks: where exactly is that boundary, and how do we design systems that respect it?

60%
AI Can Supply
40%
Requires Human Judgment
3
Curated Research Corpora

Tentatively confirmed

The 26th opens with filmed provocations, Harry Collins's keynote, and a reciprocal Buberian trialogue; the DesignX working sessions then run across the 26th and 27th, building the takeaway with GraspingAI, and on the 28th the conversation reaches the WDCC main stage on the Bund.

Keynote

Harry Collins

Distinguished Research Professor, Cardiff University

For half a century, Harry Collins has been the definitive voice on what knowledge resists being made explicit. His work on tacit knowledge, expertise, and the sociology of scientific knowledge is the ground on which this conference's central question stands: what can a machine be told, and what can it never be told? His keynote opens the first day.

Video Provocations
Markus Buehler
MIT
Sherry Turkle
MIT
Don Norman
UC San Diego · Design Lab
Cameron Tonkinwise
UTS Sydney
Ken Friedman
Tongji University · She Ji
Buberian Trialogue — Protagonists
Jonathan Boymal
RMIT University
Owen Matson
Feng Tao
Nankai University
Buberian Trialogue — Learned Listeners
Ramón Alvarado
University of Oregon
Lorenzo Magnani
University of Pavia
Ricardo Baeza-Yates
Northeastern University · UPF Barcelona
Working Sessions
Hugo Letiche
ISTEC Paris
Joel Pearson
UNSW · Future Minds Lab
Fabrizio Degni
Chief of AI · AI ethics & governance
Thomas Biedermann
Senior Lecturer · games & systems
Marco Palombi
Entrepreneur · human-centric platforms
John Hawkins
Chief AI Officer · ML researcher

Invited

Invitations are extended to the scholars, designers, and artists below; the roster will firm as acceptances arrive.

Keynote
Andy Clark
University of Sussex
Yann LeCun
Meta · NYU
Ethan Mollick
Wharton, U. Pennsylvania
Conor Grennan
NYU Stern
Arvind Narayanan
Princeton University
Vincent Blok
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Luciano Floridi
Yale University · Digital Ethics Center
Tacit Knowledge & the Legible
Dave Snowden
The Cynefin Company
Erik Rietveld
University of Amsterdam
Anthony Chemero
University of Cincinnati
Chiara Ambrosio
University College London
Rachel Ankeny
Wageningen University
Hasok Chang
University of Cambridge
Johan Heilbron
CNRS–EHESS, Paris
Joseph Rouse
Wesleyan University
Tor Nørretranders
Copenhagen
Shannon Vallor
University of Edinburgh
Jacqueline Sullivan
Rotman Institute · Western University
Philosophy of AI & Mind
Cameron Buckner
University of Houston
Sara Aronowitz
University of Toronto
Lisa Messeri
Yale University
Susan Schneider
Florida Atlantic University
Anil Seth
University of Sussex
Nicholas Shea
Institute of Philosophy, London
Been Kim
Google DeepMind
Roman Yampolskiy
University of Louisville
Jörg Noller
LMU Munich
Thomas Powers
University of Delaware
Iason Gabriel
Google DeepMind
Tony Searle
Knowledge Graph Guys
Mina Ekramnia
Max Planck · Harvard Global Health
Elizabeth Ricker
Author, Smarter Tomorrow
Design — International
Kees Dorst
TU Eindhoven · UTS Sydney
Ezio Manzini
Politecnico di Milano
Birger Sevaldson
Oslo School of Architecture & Design
Naoto Fukasawa
Tokyo
Wolfgang Jonas
Design researcher, Germany
Kun-Pyo Lee
KAIST
Dan Zhu
Design PhD · Generative-AI Artist
Additional Scholars
N. Katherine Hayles
UCLA · Duke University
Pascale Fung
HKUST
Yi Zeng
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Huang Minlie
Tsinghua University
Shen Weixing
Tsinghua University
Yu Zhang
Jilin University
Mythili Kolluru
College of Banking & Financial Studies, Muscat
Dramatic Arts
Yasmina Reza
Playwright & Novelist
Stan Lai
Playwright & Director, Taipei

Program Overview

1
September 26 · Saturday · Tongji or SUES

Opening Dialogues & DesignX

Morning
Video Provocations
Buehler · Turkle · Norman · Tonkinwise · Friedman — short filmed provocations to open the questions
Midday
Keynote
Harry Collins on tacit and explicit knowledge — what machines cannot be told
Afternoon
Buberian Trialogue
Boymal · Matson · Feng Tao and Alvarado · Magnani · Baeza-Yates — two trios who trade places partway through, each serving in turn as protagonists and as learned listeners who describe what they heard
Late Afternoon
DesignX: Framing the Orthogonal Space
The working sessions open — Lissack frames the problem: computational capability and situated human judgment as independent axes, not one scale, and the groups form
Evening
Closing: A Theatrical Meditation (invited)
"The Silences AI Cannot Produce" — an evening that steps outside the day's arguments
2
September 27 · Sunday · SUES or Tongji

DesignX Working Sessions

Morning
Working Groups I — with GraspingAI
Tentatively confirmed participants — Pearson, Degni, Biedermann, Palombi — and attendees map the space between AI and human thought
Afternoon
Working Groups II — the Journey Method
Building a way to plot a route through that space fitted to a given user's context
Late Afternoon
Consolidation
The groups bring their maps and journey drafts together, readying the takeaway carried into the 29th
3
September 28 · Monday · WDCC Main Stage, the Bund

On the Main Stage

Morning
WDCC Opening
The WDCC plenary addresses — not part of this subconference's program
Afternoon
Buberian Dialogue — on the Main Stage
A public dialogue at the Convention Center Riverside, opening with video reflections drawn from the prior two days — the conversation carried to the WDCC floor
4
September 29 · Tuesday · Tongji or SUES

The Takeaway

Morning
The Orthogonal Map
The working sessions consolidated into one shared picture: computational capability and situated human judgment drawn as independent axes rather than a single scale from worse to better — a space you can point at, where a model's reckoning is strong, where it is empty, and where the two must meet
Late Morning
The Journey Method
A repeatable way to plot a route through that space for a given context — which work to hand to the model's calculative reach, and which to hold back as embodied, situated judgment; the roughly 60/40 line drawn not in the abstract but for a real case brought into the room
Midday
Carrying It Forward
Each participant leaves having applied the map and the method once to their own domain — the takeaway is that instrument, a way of seeing and a way of deciding, not a proceedings volume

Three Formats, No Panels

I–Thou

Buberian Dialogues

Three protagonists engage through a facilitator. Distinguished listeners respond. The audience makes meaning. No debate — genuine encounter. The format is designed to produce insight that neither monologue nor panel discussion can reach.

Keynote Dialogues

Two thinkers, one question, one hour. Not a lecture followed by Q&A — a structured intellectual exchange in which both participants are changed by the conversation. The audience witnesses thinking in real time.

ψ = M

AI-Augmented Working Groups

Participants receive access to three curated research corpora and a custom interface combining Claude and NotebookLM. Groups use AI as dramaturg — retrieval, synthesis, pattern-matching — while humans supply the judgment that turns information into insight.

Shanghai, China

The conference is co-hosted by Shanghai University of Engineering Science (SUES) and Tongji University, situated in one of the world's great design cities. Shanghai's position at the intersection of Eastern and Western intellectual traditions makes it the natural home for a conversation about designing AI's boundaries.

The opening two days take place on campus — one at Tongji University's College of Design and Innovation, one at Shanghai University of Engineering Science. On 28 September the subconference moves to the WDCC main stage at the Convention Center Riverside, on the Bund, for the afternoon, and the closing day returns to campus. The assignment of specific days to Tongji and SUES is being finalized.

Institutional Hosts
SUES & Tongji University
With the support of President Lou Yongqi
Main Stage
Convention Center Riverside
On the Bund — afternoon of 28 September, as part of WDCC
Media
Major International Coverage
Press and media partnerships confirmed
Publication
She Ji Theory Issue
Companion issue: "The AI Dramaturg" — planned for publication following the conference

See the Conversation

Invitation Film

A two-minute invitation to the conversation

Watch on YouTube →

The Academic Case

The conference's intellectual framework, in slides

View the slides →

Join the Conversation

This conference is by invitation and application. We are seeking participants from design, complexity science, philosophy of mind, AI research, education, and the arts who want to spend three days thinking carefully about the boundaries between human and machine intelligence. No paper submissions required — bring your questions.

Apply to Participate

Applications reviewed on a rolling basis.
For inquiries, contact Michael Lissack at michael.lissack@gmail.com

She Ji: The AI Dramaturg

A companion theory issue of She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation is in development, titled "The AI Dramaturg." The issue will explore the conference's central proposition: that AI's role across disciplines is best understood through the dramaturgical metaphor — and that the irreducible human contribution lies in the situated judgment that no model can replicate.

Participants in the conference's AI-augmented working groups will have the opportunity to develop contributions for this issue, supported by the same research infrastructure available during the conference itself.

設計
She Ji · Design